chitay-knigi.com » Домоводство » Ум в движении. Как действие формирует мысль - Барбара Тверски

Шрифт:

-
+

Интервал:

-
+

Закладка:

Сделать
1 ... 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 ... 103
Перейти на страницу:

Bundesen, C., Larsen, A., & Farrell, J. E. (1981). Mental transformations of size and orientation. Attention and Performance, 9, 279–294.

Denis, M., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1999). Scanning visual mental images: A window on the mind. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 18, 409–465.

Shepard, R. N., & Chipman, S. (1970). Second-order isomorphism of internal representations: Shapes of states. Cognitive Psychology, 1(1), 1–17.

Конструирование мысленных образов по частям

Finke, R. A., Pinker, S., & Farah, M. J. (1989). Reinterpreting visual patterns in mental imagery. Cognitive Science, 13(1), 51–78.

Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Мысленное рисование служит основой создания мысленных образов

Novick, L. R., & Tversky, B. (1987). Cognitive constraints on ordering operations: The case of geometric analogies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116(1), 50–67.

Ошибки в суждениях о скорости движения: несчастные случаи с пешеходами

Guo, H., Wang, W., Guo, W., Jiang, X., & Bubb, H. (2012). Reliability analysis of pedestrian safety crossing in urban traffic environment. Safety Science, 50(4), 968–973.

Wierwille, W. W., Hanowski, R. J., Hankey, J. M., Kieliszewski, C. A., Lee, S. E., Medina, A., … Dingus, T. A. (2002). Identification and evaluation of driver errors: Overview and recommendations (No. FHWA-RD-02–003). Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

Люди и собаки пользуются эвристикой, чтобы ловить мяч и фрисби

McBeath, M. K., Shaffer, D. M., & Kaiser, M. K. (1995). How baseball outfielders determine where to run to catch fly balls. Science, 268(5210), 569.

Shaffer, D. M., Krauchunas, S. M., Eddy, M., & McBeath, M. K. (2004). How dogs navigate to catch Frisbees. Psychological Science, 15(7), 437–441.

Shaffer, D. M., & McBeath, M. K. (2005). Naive beliefs in baseball: Systematic distortion in perceived time of apex for fly balls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1492.

Мысленная анимация является пошаговой, а не непрерывной

Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 1084.

Hegarty, M., & Sims, V. K. (1994). Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 22(4), 411–430.

Многогранность пространственных способностей

Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 121–169). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Пространственные способности зависят как от наследственности, так и от среды

Tosto, M. G., Hanscombe, K. B., Haworth, C. M. A., Davis, O. S. P., Petrill, S. A., Dale, P. S., … Kovas, Y. (2014). Why do spatial abilities predict mathematical performance? Developmental Science, 17, 462–470. doi:10.1111/desc.12138.

Гены атлетизма

Epstein, D. (2014). The sports gene: Inside the science of extraordinary athletic performance. New York, NY: Penguin.

Несколько тестов на пространственные способности

Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817.

Гендер и мысленное вращение

Halpern, D. F. (2013). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–1498.

Voyer, D. (2011). Time limits and gender differences on paper-and-pencil tests of mental rotation: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18(2), 267–277.

Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.

Гендер и распознавание объектов

Herlitz, A., & Lovén, J. (2013). Sex differences and the own-gender bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic review. Visual Cognition, 21(9–10), 1306–1336.

Lewin, C., & Herlitz, A. (2002). Sex differences in face recognition – women’s faces make the difference. Brain and Cognition, 50(1), 121–128.

McClure, E. B. (2000). A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 424–453.

Voyer, D., Postma, A., Brake, B., & Imperato-McGinley, J. (2007). Gender differences in object location memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 23–38.

Пространственные способности важны для STEM-профессий

Tosto, M. G., Hanscombe, K. B., Haworth, C. M. A., Davis, O. S. P., Petrill, S. A., Dale, P. S., … Kovas, Y. (2014). Why do spatial abilities predict mathematical performance? Developmental Science, 17, 462–470.

Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817.

Области мозга, отвечающие за пространственные и математические способности, пересекаются

Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.

Пространственные способности важны для объяснения понятий из областей STEM

Bobek, E., & Tversky, B. (2016). Creating visual explanations improves learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 27.

Daniel, M. P., & Tversky, B. (2012). How to put things together. Cognitive Processing, 13(4), 303–319.

Hegarty, M. (2004). Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(6), 280–285.

Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 684.

1 ... 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 ... 103
Перейти на страницу:

Комментарии
Минимальная длина комментария - 25 символов.
Комментариев еще нет. Будьте первым.
Правообладателям Политика конфиденциальности